🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actress has become part of the growing list of performers who express doubts about the necessity of on-set intimacy professionals, revealing she chose not to use their assistance while filming her new movie Die My Love.

Understanding the Purpose of Intimacy Coordinators

Intimacy coordinators were introduced following the #MeToo era to ensure the safety and ease of actors during sequences involving nudity and sexual content. Yet, several well-known performers including Gwyneth Paltrow and other established stars have expressed reservations about their presence, with some claiming they interfere with creative flow.

Lawrence's Personal Experience

In conversation on the popular culture podcast, while promoting her new film where she plays a woman experiencing mental health challenges, Lawrence stated: "We chose not to use an intimacy coordinator, or maybe we did have one but didn't really utilize them... I felt entirely secure with Rob."

She elaborated: "He is completely professional and deeply devoted to his partner. Our conversations primarily focused on family life and relationships. There was absolutely no uncomfortable moments or doubts about professional limits."

"If there was the slightest indication of discomfort, I definitely would have requested an on-set professional. Numerous male actors get upset if you don't reciprocate their attention, and then the retaliation starts. Rob was completely different."

Professional Validation and Continuing Discussion

Earlier this week, industry platform IMDb formally acknowledged on-set intimacy professionals as a separate category, alongside eleven other professional roles including dance direction, catering, and puppetry. Before this, they were grouped under "miscellaneous staff" rather than having their specific credit.

Notwithstanding this validation, intimacy coordinators continue to face public discussion suggesting they aren't necessarily required standards, with well-known actors rejecting their participation. Lawrence's perspective echoes that of another prominent actress, who earlier revealed she refused professional supervision while working with her co-star on The Morning Show.

Aniston's Experience

"Jon was extremely respectful – truly each action, every cut, 'You comfortable?'" she remembered. "The scenes were additionally very choreographed. That's the benefit of working with talented directors, appropriate music. So, minimal preparation is needed."

She added, "They offered, 'Having someone check if you're comfortable,' and I responded, 'Honestly, this is sufficiently uncomfortable!' We're seasoned actors – we can handle this. And we had our director present."

Other Examples and Industry Reaction

Despite featuring multiple sequences of intimate moments and regular undress, the award-winning film – the director's Oscar-winning project about a sex worker and a wealthy heir – filmed without an on-set professional.

The film's star explained she and co-star her screen partner "concluded it would be preferable to keep it small."

"My character is a sex worker, and I had studied Sean's films and understood his commitment to authenticity. I was mentally prepared for it. As an performer, I treated it as professional work."

These statements provoked significant backlash from industry professionals, mirroring the response to Gwyneth Paltrow's public statements, who earlier this year shared that working on her forthcoming project her latest film represented her initial experience with the relatively new profession, which she "did not know existed."

Gwyneth's Viewpoint

During filming about personal ease with a particular action alongside fellow actor Timothée Chalamet, the actress answered: "I'm from the era where you get naked, you get in bed, the filming begins."

She continued that she and Chalamet then told the professional: "We think we're good. You can step back.' I don't know how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an artist, very stifled by that."

Industry Response

Following these comments, former Channel 4 drama head Caroline Hollick labeled them "irresponsible" and pointed out that most of those speaking against these professionals have established careers to command their own power and security on production locations.

"Occasionally an performer shares opinions about whether they value on-set professionals or not," commented the executive. "The actress stated she grew up in a period when industry professionals 'removed clothing and got on with it'. As a established actress in Hollywood working with a actor much younger than her, while I'm sure he is chill, I considered it somewhat concerning statement."

Male Perspective

The veteran actor, in contrast, shared that he believes the main obligation during heterosexual sex scenes rests with the male actor, instead of a third party.

"Based on my career, you take responsibility as the male actor to make certain the woman is at ease, you talk through completely," he said. "You communicate, '{OK, I'm going to make contact there if that's agreeable'. It's very deliberate but seems like it's happening naturally, which is hopefully what authentic performance appears as."